ae9ee5bdb1
ea36a453e3d06657679459e1168347648fa7c5c0 [net] Make p2p recv buffer timeout 20 minutes for all peers (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The timeout interval for the send and recv buffers was changed from 90
minutes to 20 minutes in commit f1920e86 in 2013, except for peers that
did not support the pong message (where the recv buffer timeout remained
at 90 minutes). A few observations:
- for peers that support BIP 31 (pong messages), this recv buffer
timeout is almost redundant with the ping timeout. We send a ping
message every two minutes, and set a timeout of twenty minutes to
receive the pong response. If the recv buffer was really timing out,
then the pong response would also time out.
- BIP 31 is supported by all nodes of p2p version 60000 and higher, and
has been in widespread use since 2013. I'd be very surprised if there
are many nodes on the network that don't support pong messages.
- The recv buffer timeout is not specified in any p2p BIP. We're free to
set it at any value we want.
- A peer that doesn't support BIP 31 and hasn't sent any message to us
at all in 90 minutes is unlikely to be useful for us, and is more likely
to be evicted AttemptToEvictConnection() since it'll have the worst
possible ping time and isn't providing blocks/transactions.
Therefore, we remove this check, and set the recv buffer timeout to 20
minutes for all peers. This removes the final p2p version dependent
logic from the net layer, so all p2p version data can move into the
net_processing layer.
Alternative approaches:
- Set the recv buffer timeout to 90 minutes for all peers. This almost
wouldn't be a behaviour change at all (pre-BIP 31 peers would still
have the same recv buffer timeout, and we can't ever reach a recv buffer
timeout higher than 21 minutes for post-BIP31 peers, because the pong
timeout would be hit first).
- Stop supporting peers that don't support BIP 31. BIP 31 has been in
use since 2012, and implementing it is trivial.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ea36a453e3d06657679459e1168347648fa7c5c0
promag:
Code review ACK ea36a453e3d06657679459e1168347648fa7c5c0.
practicalswift:
cr ACK ea36a453e3d06657679459e1168347648fa7c5c0: patch looks correct
ajtowns:
ACK ea36a453e3d06657679459e1168347648fa7c5c0
sipa:
utACK ea36a453e3d06657679459e1168347648fa7c5c0
jonatack:
Code review ACK ea36a453e3d06657679459e1168347648fa7c5c0
Tree-SHA512: df290bb32d2b5d9e59a0125bb215baa92787f9d01542a7437245f1c478c7f9b9831e5f170d3cd0db2811e1b11b857b3e8b2e03376476b8302148e480d81aab19
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
What is Bitcoin?
Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network. Bitcoin Core is the name of open source software which enables the use of this currency.
For more information, as well as an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/, or read the original whitepaper.
License
Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be
completely stable. Tags are created
regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.
The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python, that are run automatically on the build server.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py
The Travis CI system makes sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.
Translators should also subscribe to the mailing list.