c2dbbc35b9
72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8 Unit tests for CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF (Greg Sanders)
b767e6bd47cb0fb8f7aea3fb10c597e59a35bf74 test: unit test for ImprovesFeerateDiagram (Greg Sanders)
7e89b659e1ddd0c04fa2bddba9706b5d1a1daec3 Add fuzz test for FeeFrac (Greg Sanders)
4d6528a3d6bf3821c216c68f99170e2faab5d63c fuzz: fuzz diagram creation and comparison (Greg Sanders)
e9c5aeb11d641b8cae373452339760809625021d test: Add tests for CompareFeerateDiagram and CheckConflictTopology (Greg Sanders)
588a98dccc5dbb6e331f28d83a4a10a13d70eb31 fuzz: Add fuzz target for ImprovesFeerateDiagram (Greg Sanders)
2079b80854e2595f6f696e7c13a56c7f2a7da9f4 Implement ImprovesFeerateDiagram (Greg Sanders)
66d966dcfaad3638f84654e710f403cb0a0a2ac7 Add FeeFrac unit tests (Greg Sanders)
ce8e22542ed0b4fa5794d3203207146418d59473 Add FeeFrac utils (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
This is a smaller piece of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984 broken off for easier review.
Up to date explanation of diagram checks are here: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/mempool-incentive-compatibility/553
This infrastructure has two near term applications prior to cluster mempool:
1) Limited Package RBF(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984): We want to allow package RBF only when we know it improves the mempool. This narrowly scoped functionality allows use with v3-like topologies, and will be expanded at some point post-cluster mempool when diagram checks can be done efficiently against bounded cluster sizes.
2) Replacement for single tx RBF(in a cluster size of up to two) against conflicts of up to cluster size two. `ImprovesFeerateDiagram` interface will have to change for this use-case, which is a future direction to solve certain pins and improve mempool incentive compatibility: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/ephemeral-anchors-and-mev/383#diagram-checks-fix-this-3
And longer-term, this would be the proposed way we would compute incentive compatibility for all conflicts, post-cluster mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
glozow:
code review ACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
murchandamus:
utACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
ismaelsadeeq:
Re-ACK 7295986778
willcl-ark:
crACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
sdaftuar:
ACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
Tree-SHA512: 79593e5a087801c06f06cc8b73aa3e7b96ab938d3b90f5d229c4e4bfca887a77b447605c49aa5eb7ddcead85706c534ac5eb6146ae2396af678f4beaaa5bea8e
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.
What is Bitcoin Core?
Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.
Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.
License
Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be
completely stable. Tags are created
regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.
The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py
The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.