fanquake d690f89b57
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28785: validation: return more helpful results for reconsiderable fee failures and skipped transactions
1147e00e59e47f27024ec96629993c66a3ce4ef0 [validation] change package-fee-too-low, return wtxid(s) and effective feerate (glozow)
10dd9f2441f4618321bfa2865449ac2223c572a0 [test] use CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult in previous tests (glozow)
3979f1afcbef5fdd3fad56312573a6733a7d78a4 [validation] add TxValidationResult::TX_RECONSIDERABLE, TX_UNKNOWN (glozow)
5c786a026aee434363ad54f4346211d0e2c5a38d [refactor] use Wtxid for m_wtxids_fee_calculations (glozow)

Pull request description:

  Split off from #26711 (suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26711#issuecomment-1786392253). This is part of #27463.

  - Add 2 new TxValidationResults
    - `TX_RECONSIDERABLE` helps us encode transactions who have failed fee checks that can be bypassed using package validation. This is distinguished from `TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY` so that we re-validate a transaction if and only if it is eligible for package CPFP. In the future, we will have a separate cache for reconsiderable rejects so these transactions don't go in `m_recent_rejects`.
    - `TX_UNKNOWN` helps us communicate that we aborted package validation and didn't finish looking at this transaction: it's not valid but it's also not invalid (i.e. don't cache it as a rejected tx)
  - Return effective feerate and the wtxids of transactions used to calculate that effective feerate when the error is `TX_SINGLE_FAILURE`. Previously, we would only provide this information if the transaction passed. Now that we have package validation, it's much more helpful to the caller to know how the failing feerate was calculated. This can also be used to improve our submitpackage RPC result (which is currently a bit unhelpful when things fail).
  - Use the newly added `CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult` for existing package validation tests. This increases test coverage and helps test the changes made in this PR.

ACKs for top commit:
  instagibbs:
    reACK 1147e00e59
  achow101:
    ACK 1147e00e59e47f27024ec96629993c66a3ce4ef0
  murchandamus:
    reACK 1147e00e59e47f27024ec96629993c66a3ce4ef0
  ismaelsadeeq:
    ACK 1147e00e59e47f27024ec96629993c66a3ce4ef0

Tree-SHA512: ac1cd73c2b487a1b99d329875d39d8107c91345a5b0b241d54a6a4de67faf11be69a2721cc732c503024a9cca381dac33d61e187957279e3c82653bea118ba91
2023-11-08 10:17:05 +00:00
2023-09-01 07:49:31 +01:00
2023-10-12 13:07:06 +02:00
2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
2022-12-24 11:40:16 +01:00
2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
2022-08-23 16:57:46 -04:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.2 GiB
Languages
C++ 63.7%
Python 18.8%
C 13.7%
CMake 1.2%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.6%