fanquake d9c1cc5f1f
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28027: test: Fixes and updates to wallet_backwards_compatibility.py for 25.0 and descriptor wallets
afd9a673c458e97305da49a70a1ddbf60e651876 test: roundtrip wallet backwards compat downgrade (Andrew Chow)
bbf43c63b9472a79462e625a1f0592973c22b47c test: Add 25.0 to wallet backwards compatibiilty test (Andrew Chow)
538939ec39e146bedffb80cf84849a450ea8fead test: Run upgrade test on all nodes (Andrew Chow)
6d4699028b17cb33953f7d11764e06069dd58915 test: Run downgrade test on descriptor wallets (Andrew Chow)
f158573be12746991b75587cc9e41a74a5e986eb test: Add 0.21 tr() incompatibility test (Andrew Chow)
f41215c3f08f99d1bfa524f2da8055b6a4458bbb test: add logging 0.17 incompatibilities in wallet back compat (Andrew Chow)
71c03aeff7e1c63c21fa72d119311230f0b30e73 test: Refactor v19 addmultisigaddress test to be distinct (Andrew Chow)
53f35d02cb7b67ddecc9514559083f85093b6ce5 test: Remove w1_v18 from wallet backwards compatibility (Andrew Chow)
313d665437079ce8426916a41a11972e97c73d6d test: Fix 0.16 wallet paths and downgrade test (Andrew Chow)
5d8469362acfb7a03e0f767dbb7166830355bead test: Add helper functions for checking node versions (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  It was somewhat surprising to me that wallet_backwards_compatibility.py did not catch #27915 since the purpose of the test is to find downgrade issues such as that. It turns out the test was deficient in several places when it came to testing descriptor wallets, as well as deficient in addition to failing to correctly test some releases.

  This PR fixes these test cases, adds more informative logging, slightly refactors the entire test in order to better test future versions, and adds a 25.0 node to the test.

  Notable changes:
  * The compatibility test with 0.16 should not have been passing. The wallets were being copied incorrectly for 0.16 and resulting in 0.16 creating new wallets rather than testing the target wallets.
  * The downgrade test will actually be run on descriptor wallets and it will test that downgrades are successful, and a subsequent upgrade is also successful. This catches #27915.
  * The upgrade and downgrade test will be run on all versions up to master, rather than just 0.16, 0.17, and 0.19.

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    re-ACK afd9a673c458e97305da49a70a1ddbf60e651876
  furszy:
    ACK afd9a67

Tree-SHA512: dd2d85cab29a636da93020681c533534af4a9cda18d8550c9db9d8937719b3a225025966981c5d4d2f30486448a772b760f0e723a25ea6bc49df80387dc7b8b0
2023-10-05 16:51:15 +01:00
2023-09-01 07:49:31 +01:00
2023-10-03 16:37:43 +02:00
2021-09-07 06:12:53 +03:00
2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
2023-09-15 13:47:50 +01:00
2022-12-24 11:40:16 +01:00
2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
2022-08-23 16:57:46 -04:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.3 GiB
Languages
C++ 64.3%
Python 19.7%
C 12.1%
CMake 1.3%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.6%