Ava Chow e2174378aa Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32539: init: Configure reachable networks before we start the RPC server
12ff4be9c7 test: ensure -rpcallowip is compatible with RFC4193 (Matthew Zipkin)
c02bd3c187 config: Explain RFC4193 and CJDNS interaction in help and init error (Matthew Zipkin)
f728b6b111 init: Configure reachable networks before we start the RPC server (Matthew Zipkin)

Pull request description:

  Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32433

  `MaybeFlipIPv6toCJDNS()` relies on `g_reachable_nets` to distinguish between CJDNS addresses and other IPv6 addresses. In particular, [RFC4193](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4193#section-3.1) address or "Unique Local Address" with the L-bit unset also begins with the `fc` prefix. #32433 highlights a use case for these addresses that have nothing to do with CJDNS.

  On master we don't parse init flags like `-cjdnsreachable` until *after* the HTTP server has started, causing conflicts with `-rpcallowip` because CJDNS doesn't support subnets.

  This PR ensures that `NET_CJDNS` is only present in the reachable networks list if set by `-cjdnsreachable` *before* `-rpcallowip` is checked. If it is set all `fc` addresses are assumed to be CJDNS, can not have subnets, and can't be set for `-rpcallowip`.

  I also noted this specific parameter interaction in the init help as well as the error message if configured incorrectly.

  This can be tested locally:

  `bitcoind -regtest -rpcallowip=fc00:dead:beef::/64 -rpcuser=u -rpcpassword=p`

  On master this will just throw an error that doesn't even mention IPv6 at all.

  On the branch, this will succeed and can be tested by adding the ULA to a local interface.

  On linux: `sudo ip -6 addr add fc00:dead:beef::1/64 dev lo`

  On macos: `sudo ifconfig lo0 inet6 fc00:dead:beef::1/128 add`

  then: `curl -v -g -6 --interface fc00:dead:beef::1 u:p@[::1]:18443 --data '{"method":"getblockcount"}'`

  If the `rpcallowip` option is removed, the RPC request will fail to authorize.

  Finally, adding `-cjdnsreachable` to the start up command will throw an error and specify the incompatibility:

  > RFC4193 is allowed only if -cjdnsreachable=0.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 12ff4be9c7
  tapcrafter:
    tACK 12ff4be9c7
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 12ff4be9c7
  willcl-ark:
    ACK 12ff4be9c7

Tree-SHA512: a4dd70ca2bb9f6ec2c0a9463fd73985d1ed80552c674a9067ac9a86662d1c018cc275ba757cebb2993c5f3971ecf4778b95d35fe7a7178fb41b1d18b601c9960
2025-06-06 15:31:36 -07:00
2025-05-20 21:38:07 +02:00
2025-02-06 09:38:49 +00:00
2025-06-03 08:09:28 +01:00
2025-06-03 08:09:28 +01:00
2025-06-03 08:09:21 +01:00
2025-01-06 12:23:11 +00:00
2025-05-20 09:30:41 +01:00
2025-05-09 14:58:38 +02:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/license/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.2 GiB
Languages
C++ 63.7%
Python 18.9%
C 13.6%
CMake 1.2%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.6%