f4f1d6d230
a733dd79e2Remove unused function `reliesOnAssumedValid` (Suhas Daftuar)d4a11abb19Cache block index entry corresponding to assumeutxo snapshot base blockhash (Suhas Daftuar)3556b85022Move CheckBlockIndex() from Chainstate to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)0ce805b632Documentation improvements for assumeutxo (Ryan Ofsky)768690b7ceFix initialization of setBlockIndexCandidates when working with multiple chainstates (Suhas Daftuar)d43a1f1a2fTighten requirements for adding elements to setBlockIndexCandidates (Suhas Daftuar)d0d40ea9a6Move block-storage-related logic to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)3cfc75366etest: Clear block index flags when testing snapshots (Suhas Daftuar)272fbc370cUpdate CheckBlockIndex invariants for chains based on an assumeutxo snapshot (Suhas Daftuar)10c05710ceAdd wrapper for adding entries to a chainstate's block index candidates (Suhas Daftuar)471da5f6e7Move block-arrival information / preciousblock counters to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)1cfc887d00Remove CChain dependency in node/blockstorage (Suhas Daftuar)fe86a7cd48Explicitly track maximum block height stored in undo files (Suhas Daftuar) Pull request description: This PR proposes a clean up of the relationship between block storage and the chainstate objects, by moving the decision of whether to store a block on disk to something that is not chainstate-specific. Philosophically, the decision of whether to store a block on disk is related to validation rules that do not require any UTXO state; for anti-DoS reasons we were using some chainstate-specific heuristics, and those have been reworked here to achieve the proposed separation. This PR also fixes a bug in how a chainstate's `setBlockIndexCandidates` was being initialized; it should always have all the HAVE_DATA block index entries that have more work than the chain tip. During startup, we were not fully populating `setBlockIndexCandidates` in some scenarios involving multiple chainstates. Further, this PR establishes a concept that whenever we have 2 chainstates, that we always know the snapshotted chain's base block and the base block's hash must be an element of our block index. Given that, we can establish a new invariant that the background validation chainstate only needs to consider blocks leading to that snapshotted block entry as potential candidates for its tip. As a followup I would imagine that when writing net_processing logic to download blocks for the background chainstate, that we would use this concept to only download blocks towards the snapshotted entry as well. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACKa733dd79e2jamesob: reACKa733dd79e2([`jamesob/ackr/27746.5.sdaftuar.rework_validation_logic`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/27746.5.sdaftuar.rework_validation_logic)) Sjors: Code review ACKa733dd79e2. ryanofsky: Code review ACKa733dd79e2. Just suggested changes since the last review. There are various small things that could be followed up on, but I think this is ready for merge. Tree-SHA512: 9ec17746f22b9c27082743ee581b8adceb2bd322fceafa507b428bdcc3ffb8b4c6601fc61cc7bb1161f890c3d38503e8b49474da7b5ab1b1f38bda7aa8668675
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.
What is Bitcoin Core?
Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.
Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.
License
Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be
completely stable. Tags are created
regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.
The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py
The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.