f7fd76bcc0
2c403279e2f0f7c8c27c56d4e7b0573c59571f0a gitian: Remove codesign_allocate and pagestuff from MacOS build (Andrew Chow) f55eed251488d70d5e2e3a2965a4f8ec0c476853 gitian: use signapple to create the MacOS code signature (Andrew Chow) 95b06d21852b28712db6c710e420a58bdc1a0944 gitian: use signapple to apply the MacOS code signature (Andrew Chow) 42bb1ea363286b088257cabccb686ef1887c1d3b gitian: install signapple in gitian-osx-signer.yml (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: The MacOS code signing issues that were encountered during the 0.21.0 release cycle have shown that it is necessary for us to use a code signing tool for which the source code is available and modifiable by us. Given that there appears to not be such a tool available, I have written such a tool, [signapple](https://github.com/achow101/signapple), that we can use. This tool is able to create a valid MacOS code signature, detach it in a way that we were doing previously, and attach it to the unsigned binary. This tool can also verify that the signature is correct. This PR implements the usage of that tool in the gitian build for the code signed MacOS binary. The code signer will use this tool to create the detached signature. Gitian builders will use this tool to apply the detached signature. The `gitian-osx-signer.yml` descriptor has been modified to install this tool so that the `detached-sig-apply.sh` script can use it. Additionally, the `codesign_allocate` and `pagestuff` tools are no longer necessary so they are no longer added to the tarball used in code signing. Lastly, both the `detached-sig-create.sh` and `detached-sig-apply.sh` scripts are made to be significantly less complex and to not do unexpected things such as unpacking an already unpacked tarball. The detached code signature that signapple creates is almost identical to that which we were previously creating. The only difference is that the cpu architecture name is included in the extension (e.g. we have `bitcoin-qt.x86_64sign` instead of `bitcoin-qt.sign`). This was done in order to support signing universal binaries which we may want to do in the future. However signapple can still apply existing code signatures as it will accept the `.sign` extension. If it is desired, it can be modified to produce signatures with just the `.sign` extension. However I do not think it is necessary to maintain compatibility with the old process. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 2c403279e2f0f7c8c27c56d4e7b0573c59571f0a Tree-SHA512: 2a0e01e9133f8859b9de26e7e8fe1d2610d2cbdee2845e6008b12c083c7e3622cbb2d9b83c50a269e2c3074ab95914a8225d3cd4108017f58b77a62bf10951e0
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
What is Bitcoin?
Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network. Bitcoin Core is the name of open source software which enables the use of this currency.
For more information, as well as an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/, or read the original whitepaper.
License
Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be
completely stable. Tags are created
regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.
The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python, that are run automatically on the build server.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py
The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.
Translators should also subscribe to the mailing list.